Many seniors approaching retirement often find Social Security rules difficult to understand, particularly when it comes to choosing the best age to begin claiming benefits.

A new proposal in Congress aims to make that process easier by simplifying the language used in government documents.

The bill is designed to give older Americans clearer information so they can make better decisions about their financial futures.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are backing the measure, signaling its potential to move forward.


Rep. Lloyd Smucker, a Republican representing Lancaster and parts of York County, announced the Age Clarity Act this week.

The legislation would update confusing terms that millions of seniors encounter when reviewing Social Security options.

“Older Americans approaching retirement age should make informed decisions when deciding to claim the Social Security benefits they have earned,” Smucker said in a statement.

He added, “This straightforward legislation aims to simplify bureaucratic jargon which may mislead Americans into making poor financial decisions. I thank Rep. Beyer for joining me in introducing this legislation and will work across the aisle to advance this commonsense measure.”


Under the proposed bill, “Early Eligibility Age” would be renamed “Minimum Benefit Age,” making clear that while benefits can begin at 62, they come at a permanent reduction of up to 30% compared to the standard benefit.

“Full Retirement Age” would become “Standard Benefit Age,” referring to the 66–67 range depending on birth year.

“Delayed Retirement Age” would shift to “Maximum Benefit Age,” signaling the highest benefit level available at 70, with an 8% increase per year beyond standard retirement.

Supporters argue these simple changes will help prevent seniors from making costly mistakes based on unclear terms.


Also read: New SNAP eligibility changes take effect—here’s what it could mean for your benefits

The bill has bipartisan backing in both chambers of Congress, with Rep. Don Beyer of Virginia co-sponsoring it in the House.

In the Senate, Sens. Bill Cassidy, Christopher Coons, Susan Collins, and Tim Kaine have introduced companion legislation.

Advocates for seniors say the effort reflects growing recognition of how important retirement planning is for millions of Americans.

With Social Security forming the foundation of retirement income for many households, even modest changes in clarity can have lasting effects.


Also read: Three surprising ways your Social Security benefits could be reduced or stopped

As debates on Social Security continue, this measure stands out for its focus on communication rather than funding formulas or benefit adjustments.

By changing technical terms into plain language, lawmakers hope to help seniors fully understand the trade-offs between claiming early, waiting until the standard age, or maximizing benefits later.

The proposal may also help financial advisors, retirement planners, and government agencies better guide older adults.

If passed, the bill could reshape how millions of people approach one of the most important financial decisions of their lives.

Read next: What Social Security really looks like at 72 in 2025
Do you think simplifying the language around Social Security will actually help seniors make better choices, or should Congress be focused more on the financial future of the program itself? Share your thoughts in the comments and tell us what you think about the Age Clarity Act.