This 160-year-old painting has an alleged time traveler–Expert decodes the mystery!
- Replies 0
In the realm of art and history, mysteries often capture our imagination, leading us down rabbit holes of speculation and wonder.
Such was the case with a 160-year-old painting that set the internet ablaze with theories of time travel due to an object in the subject's hands that bore an uncanny resemblance to a modern item.
The painting was crafted by the skilled hand of Austrian artist Ferdinand George Waldmüller in 1860 and has recently become the center of a peculiar debate. What is this modern object and why was it in the artwork?
When the painting known as The Expected One resurfaced in the public eye, thanks to the keen observation of a tourist from Glasgow named Peter Russell, the internet did a collective double-take.
The painting depicts a young woman walking along a path, seemingly engrossed in an object that looks strikingly similar to an iPhone.
In the background, a man awaits her with a flower, a detail that, while romantic, was quickly overshadowed by the technological anomaly.
The painting, housed at the Neue Pinakothek—a museum dedicated to 18th and 19th-century art in Munich—became the subject of viral fascination.

Russell, in an interview back in 2017, mused about the transformative power of technology on our perception.
He said, “What strikes me most is how much a change in technology has changed the interpretation of the painting, and in a way has leveraged its entire context.”
Russell also adds that. "The big change is that in 1850 or 1860, every single viewer would have identified the item that the girl is absorbed in as a hymnal or prayer book."
The resemblance to a smartphone was so compelling that it sparked a flurry of time-traveling theories across social media platforms.
Some whimsically entertained the idea that the woman was indeed a time traveler, caught in a moment of temporal displacement–even if the first iPhones were not marketed until 2007.
Others, however, clung to their skepticism, dismissing the notion of science fiction intersecting with 19th-century art.
Enter Gerald Weinpolter, an art expert specializing in 19th and 20th-century artwork, who stepped in to demystify the painting's enigmatic detail.
Speaking to the team at Vice, Weinpolter provided a definitive explanation that aligned with the historical context of the artwork.
“The girl in this Waldmüller painting is not playing with her new iPhone X but is off to church holding a little prayer book in her hands,” he clarified, effectively dispelling the fanciful time-traveling art theories.
Have you ever encountered a historical artifact or artwork that seemed ahead of its time? How does our current technological landscape influence your understanding of historical contexts? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Such was the case with a 160-year-old painting that set the internet ablaze with theories of time travel due to an object in the subject's hands that bore an uncanny resemblance to a modern item.
The painting was crafted by the skilled hand of Austrian artist Ferdinand George Waldmüller in 1860 and has recently become the center of a peculiar debate. What is this modern object and why was it in the artwork?
When the painting known as The Expected One resurfaced in the public eye, thanks to the keen observation of a tourist from Glasgow named Peter Russell, the internet did a collective double-take.
The painting depicts a young woman walking along a path, seemingly engrossed in an object that looks strikingly similar to an iPhone.
In the background, a man awaits her with a flower, a detail that, while romantic, was quickly overshadowed by the technological anomaly.
The painting, housed at the Neue Pinakothek—a museum dedicated to 18th and 19th-century art in Munich—became the subject of viral fascination.

The painting, The Expected One by Ferdinand George Waldmüller, sparked theories about time travel due to a misunderstood object in the woman's hands. Image source: Wikimedia Commons.
Russell, in an interview back in 2017, mused about the transformative power of technology on our perception.
He said, “What strikes me most is how much a change in technology has changed the interpretation of the painting, and in a way has leveraged its entire context.”
Russell also adds that. "The big change is that in 1850 or 1860, every single viewer would have identified the item that the girl is absorbed in as a hymnal or prayer book."
The resemblance to a smartphone was so compelling that it sparked a flurry of time-traveling theories across social media platforms.
Some whimsically entertained the idea that the woman was indeed a time traveler, caught in a moment of temporal displacement–even if the first iPhones were not marketed until 2007.
Others, however, clung to their skepticism, dismissing the notion of science fiction intersecting with 19th-century art.
Enter Gerald Weinpolter, an art expert specializing in 19th and 20th-century artwork, who stepped in to demystify the painting's enigmatic detail.
Speaking to the team at Vice, Weinpolter provided a definitive explanation that aligned with the historical context of the artwork.
“The girl in this Waldmüller painting is not playing with her new iPhone X but is off to church holding a little prayer book in her hands,” he clarified, effectively dispelling the fanciful time-traveling art theories.
Key Takeaways
- An art expert has clarified that the “time-traveling” woman in a 160-year-old painting is actually holding a prayer book, not an iPhone.
- The painting, The Expected One by Ferdinand George Waldmüller, sparked theories about time travel due to a misunderstood object in the woman's hands.
- The object that appeared to be a smartphone is now understood to be a reflection of how technology changes our perception of historical artworks.
- Despite initial speculation and online theories, the expert confirmed the true nature of the object aligning with the historical context of the 1860 painting.
Have you ever encountered a historical artifact or artwork that seemed ahead of its time? How does our current technological landscape influence your understanding of historical contexts? Share your thoughts in the comments below!